The New Scramble for Africa: China, Russia, and the West in 2026
Africa is no longer a passive recipient of foreign interest — it is the arena where 21st-century great power competition is being decided.
The
original Scramble for Africa, formalised at the 1884 Berlin Conference, took
less than two decades to partition an entire continent among European powers.
Today’s competition is less cartographic but no less consequential. It is being
fought across port concessions, military basing agreements, debt instruments,
and diplomatic votes in multilateral institutions. The actors have multiplied.
The stakes — for Africa’s sovereignty, development, and strategic autonomy —
are higher than they have been in generations.
This
piece is the first in a 30-day series examining the forces shaping Africa and
the world. There is no better place to begin than the question that underlies
almost every other: who wants what from Africa, and what are Africans doing
about it?
China: Infrastructure as Influence
China’s
engagement with Africa over the past two decades has been staggering in scale.
Through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its predecessor frameworks,
Beijing has financed ports in Djibouti and Tanzania, railways in Ethiopia and
Kenya, highways across the continent, and power infrastructure from Nigeria to
Zambia. Between 2013 and 2023, Chinese companies signed contracts in Africa
worth more than $700 billion under the BRI [1].
By 2024, two-way China-Africa trade had surpassed $290 billion, cementing
China’s status as the continent’s largest bilateral trading partner [2]. At the 2024 Forum on China-Africa
Cooperation (FOCAC-9), President Xi Jinping reaffirmed China’s position as
Africa’s largest bilateral creditor and announced a fresh resource package of
over $50 billion [3].
But
the story that matters more is the strategic one. China does not build roads in
Africa out of altruism. It builds them because infrastructure creates economic
dependency, because debt creates diplomatic leverage, and because presence
creates influence. The Djibouti naval base — China’s first overseas military
installation — is a template, not an anomaly.
None
of this makes China simply a villain in Africa’s story. By February 2025, 53
out of 54 African countries had signed BRI memoranda of understanding with
China — a figure that reflects genuine demand, not coercion [4]. The honest assessment: China has
offered genuine infrastructure at genuine cost. African nations collectively
went from receiving nearly $30 billion in Chinese loans between 2010 and 2014
to paying out $22 billion between 2020 and 2024 — a swing of $52 billion [5]. The question is not whether to engage
with China, but how to negotiate terms that serve African development rather
than simply Chinese strategic interests.
Russia: The Security Vacuum Play
Russia’s
approach to Africa is different in character and ambition. Where China builds,
Russia secures — inserting itself into the security vacuums that chronic
instability and Western disengagement have created.
Following
Wagner’s official withdrawal from Mali on June 6, 2025, Russia’s Ministry of Defense
deployed Africa Corps — a fully state-controlled paramilitary force — to
continue operations [6]. In Mali,
Burkina Faso, the Central African Republic, Sudan, and Libya, Russian-linked
forces have traded security provision for mineral access, political influence,
and the removal of French and Western military presences.
The
substance of what Russia delivers has been far more questionable. RAND
Corporation research found that fatalities linked to Islamist groups were at
record highs across Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso in the first half of 2024 —
even as Africa Corps claimed security gains [7].
A 2025 Georgetown Journal of International Affairs analysis concluded that
Russia helps juntas “stay in power and appear strong, but it hasn’t solved the
deeper security problems” [8].
Security without development is a holding position, not a partnership.
The West: Partnership Rhetoric, Implementation Deficit
The
Western engagement with Africa — primarily through the United States, European
Union, France, and the United Kingdom — contains genuine goods and genuine
contradictions in roughly equal measure.
France’s
Françafrique — the system of political, military, and economic patronage that
kept former colonies in managed dependency — is only now, under the pressure of
popular revolt and coup governments, beginning to unravel. The United States
has retreated from continent-wide engagement under the current administration,
leaving a vacuum that AGOA reviews, aid cuts, and reduced diplomatic attention
have widened. The EU continues to pursue trade agreements designed primarily to
serve European economic interests, while its migration policies have made
African mobility increasingly difficult.
The
fundamental Western problem in Africa is a credibility gap. When Western
governments condemn Russian interventionism while maintaining their own
military bases, or lecture on debt sustainability while their own financial institutions
loaded African nations with extractive loans, African publics and governments
notice. The soft power that Western democratic governance once carried has been
eroded — not primarily by Chinese or Russian messaging, but by Western
inconsistency.
Africa’s Leverage: More Than Anyone Admits
Sub-Saharan
Africa holds approximately 30 percent of the world’s proven critical mineral
reserves — including cobalt, lithium, manganese, platinum, and the rare earths
that the global clean energy transition depends on
[9]. The Democratic Republic of the Congo alone accounts for over
70 percent of global cobalt output and roughly half the world’s proven cobalt reserves [10]. Global revenues from copper, nickel,
cobalt, and lithium are projected to total $16 trillion over the next 25 years;
Sub-Saharan Africa stands to capture over $2 trillion of that figure [11].
Africa’s
population currently stands at roughly 1.55 billion and is projected to reach
nearly 2.5 billion by 2050, at which point more than one in four people on
Earth will be African [12]. The
African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), now operational, creates a single
market projected to grow to 1.7 billion people and $6.7 trillion in consumer
and business spending by 2030[13].
And Africa commands 54 votes in the UN General Assembly.
Pan-African
agency — the capacity to play competing powers against each other while
building genuine regional integration — is not a fantasy. It is a project. And
it is, slowly, being built.
What to Watch in 2026
Mineral
negotiations. How African governments renegotiate mining
contracts — particularly for cobalt in the DRC and lithium in Zimbabwe and
Namibia — will signal whether resource sovereignty is rhetoric or reality.
The
Sahel stabilisation question. Whether Russia-aligned
juntas in Mali and Burkina Faso can deliver meaningful security improvements
will test the viability of the Russian model.
AGOA
renewal. The terms of AGOA’s renewal will signal US trade
intentions toward Africa in a critical bilateral relationship.
AU
institutional reform. Whether the African Union can finance
itself without donor dependency — particularly through the 0.2% import levy —
will determine how seriously we should take continental agency claims.
The
new scramble is real. But so is Africa’s capacity to shape its outcome. The
story of this competition will be written not only in Beijing, Moscow, and
Brussels — but in Abuja, Addis Ababa, Nairobi, and the capitals of a continent
that has learned, across centuries of foreign interest, how to survive the
attention of great powers. The question now is whether survival is enough — or
whether this generation of African leaders will finally convert that attention
into genuine transformation.
REFERENCES
[1] China-Global South
Project (2024). Five Key Chinese Belt and Road Projects in Africa. https://chinaglobalsouth.com/2024/09/01/five-key-chinese-belt-and-road-projects-in-africa/
[2] World Economic
Forum (2024). Understanding Evolving China-Africa Economic Relations. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/06/why-strong-regional-value-chains-will-be-vital-to-the-next-chapter-of-china-and-africas-economic-relationship/
[3] Center for Global
Development (2025). Channeling the FOCAC 2024 Financing Pledge. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/channeling-focac-2024-financing-pledge-time-global-turmoil
[4] The Republic
Nigeria (2025). Is China’s BRI in Africa a Development Catalyst or Debt Trap?. https://rpublc.com/africa-2/china-belt-and-road-initiative-africa/
[5] Africa Defense
Forum (2026). China Ramps Up Debt Collection. https://adf-magazine.com/2026/02/china-ramps-up-debt-collection/
[6] Africanews (2025).
Russia Expands Military Footprint in Sahel with Africa Corps. https://www.africanews.com/2025/07/24/russia-expands-military-footprint-in-sahel-with-shift-from-wagner-to-state-controlled-afri/
[7] RAND Corporation
(2025). The Wagner Group Is Leaving Mali. But Russian Mercenaries Aren’t Going
Anywhere. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2025/06/the-wagner-group-is-leaving-mali-but-russian-mercenaries.html
[8] Georgetown Journal
of International Affairs (2025). Russia in Africa: Private Military Proxies in
the Sahel. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2025/03/24/russia-in-africa-private-military-proxies-in-the-sahel/
[9] IMF (2024).
Digging for Opportunity: Harnessing Sub-Saharan Africa’s Wealth in Critical
Minerals. https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2024/04/29/cf-harnessing-sub-saharan-africas-critical-mineral-wealth
[10]
Brookings
Institution (2025). Africa’s Strategic Positioning in the Critical Minerals
Race. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/africas-strategic-positioning-in-the-global-green-revolution-and-critical-minerals-race/
[11]
IMF
Regional Economic Outlook – Sub-Saharan Africa (2024). Analytical Note:
Critical Minerals. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/REO/AFR/2024/April/English/MineralsNote.ashx
[12]
UNECA
(2024). As Africa’s Population Crosses 1.5 Billion, the Demographic Window Is
Opening. https://www.uneca.org/stories/(blog)-as-africa%E2%80%99s-population-crosses-1.5-billion,-the-demographic-window-is-opening-getting
[13]
World
Economic Forum (2024). Understanding Evolving China-Africa Economic Relations
[AfCFTA data]. https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/06/why-strong-regional-value-chains-will-be-vital-to-the-next-chapter-of-china-and-africas-economic-relationship/

Comments
Post a Comment